chaos4NH wrote:I apologize for any discomfort caused by the tone of my post.  

  I am merely concerned that a safety item, being snug in your seat for better car control, would not receive a more detailed look. In light of the fact that a roll bar or cage, both of which can help stiffen the chassis, are allowed, I felt that the removal of 6 lbs would be a minor issue.  
Could you give me an opinion on acceptablility of moving the seat cushion forward an inch or so to allow acess to the belt mounting points? 
 
 
I appreciate your consideration.
 
Don't get me wrong, I understand your position.  It's unfortunate
that Mazda chose to bury the hardpoints so far behind the seat.
There are those who would argue that a 5-point harness without a
rollbar is actually more dangerous in a rollover accident than the
stock 3-point belts, so you won't get as much traction as you think
from the safety angle.
The issue is that the rules need to apply equally to a couple hundred
different cars, and that balancing act means that not everyone will be
happy with every decision that we make.  If you've never had the
pleasure of attending a rules meeting, you would find that striking 
what we hope is a balance between the classes can result in, shall 
we say, "heated" debate.   
 
 
So, let's say we allow you to remove your 6 pound rear seats in 
Showroom Stock.  You're in SSA.  The E30 M3 is also in SSA.  The 
E30's rear seats don't weigh 6 pounds.  What if they weigh 50 pounds?  
Do you want to give your competitors that kind of performance
advantage?
This doesn't even begin to address the spirit of "Showroom Stock"
cars having their interiors removed.
As far as moving the seat forward, this is probably acceptable, as
long as the shifted seat is mounted securely enough that you won't
get thrown out at tech.  We'd hate to see that seat get loose in an
accident and whack you in the head.