Interpretation of ST rule for spoilers

Questions, comments, and discussions concerning COMSCC rules.

Moderators: Boondocker850, blindsidefive0

Post Reply
User avatar
Dave_G
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:05 pm
Location: Vermont

Interpretation of ST rule for spoilers

Post by Dave_G » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:21 pm

The COM rule book states this regarding spoilers in Street Touring classes:
Aftermarket aerodynamic devices are prohibited with the exception of front air dams/spoilers and rear spoiler,
unless a factory option. Front air dam must be fixed and positioned no lower than bottom of wheel
I understand this to mean that except for the height requirement and being fixed, front spoilers are unrestricted, correct? Do splitters fall into the category of "air dams/spoilers," or are those something different?

At Tremblant I was convinced that adding something to the font of my Miata's currently naked nose would in fact make a difference. I just want to make sure I understand the rule correctly before going wild with the front of my car.
Dave
ST4 Miata #62

User avatar
brucesallen
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 1468
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 9:56 am
Location: NH
Contact:

Re: Interpretation of ST rule for spoilers

Post by brucesallen » Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:33 pm

note the height restriction: "positioned no lower than bottom of wheel"
Bruce Allen
The Greased Shadow
"It's all about the fast lap"

Grippy
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 376
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:59 pm
Location: Northbridge, MA

Re: Interpretation of ST rule for spoilers

Post by Grippy » Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:17 pm

keep in mind, it is hard to creat downforce, it is easy to increase drag.
The factory lip is a good compromise, the Garage Vary piece is a bit better IMHO.
Gordon Andrade
#10 Super C MX-5

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest