Clarification for suspension changes in ST2

Questions, comments, and discussions concerning COMSCC rules.

Moderators: Boondocker850, blindsidefive0

User avatar
eclip5e
Speed Setter
Speed Setter
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Somerville, MA
Contact:

Clarification for suspension changes in ST2

Post by eclip5e » Fri Feb 02, 2007 1:01 am

X. 7. G. Camber/caster plates or eccentric bushings/bearings for the
purpose of adjusting camber/caster are allowed provided that the stock
suspension mounting points are retained and not modified. No
modifications to the stock strut towers are allowed.
Would aftermarket lateral links be allowed? They allow for more fined tuned adjustablity for camber and tow in/out. It also changes the joints front regular to pillowball.
Image
Ron. A
R̶A̶S̶p̶e̶c̶ ̶I̶m̶p̶r̶e̶z̶a̶ ̶W̶R̶X̶ ̶-̶ ̶#̶8̶6̶ 2004-2010
2017 Subaru BRZ Limited, 112T50

PaddyMcP
Speed Setter
Speed Setter
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:41 pm

Post by PaddyMcP » Fri Feb 02, 2007 1:50 am

looks good to me ron.

WillM
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 1453
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 10:14 pm

Post by WillM » Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:59 am

Looks good, but not legal in ST!!
96 Miata #72 SC
PRA 4 :sunny:

cuda6666
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:54 am

Post by cuda6666 » Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:52 am

Looks perfectly legal to me. The spirit of the quoted rule is that you can use mechanical devices to adjust camber as long as the suspension pickup points are not changed.

User avatar
eclip5e
Speed Setter
Speed Setter
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Somerville, MA
Contact:

Post by eclip5e » Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:54 am

I would agree that the idea was to be able to modify the suspension without modifying the mounting points on the vehicle, this would follow along with the ability to modify the struts, springs to allow for adjustability utilizing stock mounting points.
Last edited by eclip5e on Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ron. A
R̶A̶S̶p̶e̶c̶ ̶I̶m̶p̶r̶e̶z̶a̶ ̶W̶R̶X̶ ̶-̶ ̶#̶8̶6̶ 2004-2010
2017 Subaru BRZ Limited, 112T50

cuda6666
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:54 am

Post by cuda6666 » Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:06 am

I think the problem is that the rule book states that only modifications that are specifically called out are allowed. Sometimes the rulemakers (us), when writing a rule that's based on a concept (allowing camber adjustment), don't include every possible method of achieving the allowed effect. In this case, camber plates and asymetrical bushings are mentioned, but adjustable control arms are not. I'd be willing to bet that whoever wrote that rule did not specifically intend to outlaw adjustable control arms. I guess it comes down to how inflexible we want to be in the face of logic.

User avatar
eclip5e
Speed Setter
Speed Setter
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Somerville, MA
Contact:

Post by eclip5e » Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:09 am

So in a situation handled that way, it would come down to how the rules are interpreted if it came to a protest.
Ron. A
R̶A̶S̶p̶e̶c̶ ̶I̶m̶p̶r̶e̶z̶a̶ ̶W̶R̶X̶ ̶-̶ ̶#̶8̶6̶ 2004-2010
2017 Subaru BRZ Limited, 112T50

therooster
Fast Lapper
Fast Lapper
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 8:41 pm

Post by therooster » Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:56 pm

As a fomer steward and board member I would say that if the rule does not allow it you are illegal and that you would lose the protest. However most likely if no one protest you no one will know and you can submit a rule change proposal at the end of the year to make it legal

Chris A.

edit spelling

User avatar
Stynger
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Medway, MA

Re: Clarification for suspension changes in ST2

Post by Stynger » Fri Feb 02, 2007 1:10 pm

eclip5e wrote:
X. 7. G. Camber/caster plates or eccentric bushings/bearings for the
purpose of adjusting camber/caster are allowed provided that the stock
suspension mounting points are retained and not modified. No
modifications to the stock strut towers are allowed.
Would aftermarket lateral links be allowed? They allow for more fined tuned adjustablity for camber and tow in/out. It also changes the joints front regular to pillowball.
You need to ask for a rule change.
No where in the above rule does it mention modifying toe adjustment.
Les.

COM Instructor

NA Miata D-TYPE
#77

Drive it like you stole it!

cuda6666
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:54 am

Re: Clarification for suspension changes in ST2

Post by cuda6666 » Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:24 pm

You need to ask for a rule change.
No where in the above rule does it mention modifying toe adjustment.

So, are you saying that adjustable control arms are legal if they're used only to adjust camber? :lol:

See, this is where things tend to get a little ridiculous. The intent of the current rule is clearly to allow camber adjustment devices as long as people don't go nuts and start changing pickup points.

User avatar
Stynger
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Medway, MA

Re: Clarification for suspension changes in ST2

Post by Stynger » Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:32 pm

cuda6666 wrote:
You need to ask for a rule change.
No where in the above rule does it mention modifying toe adjustment.

So, are you saying that adjustable control arms are legal if they're used only to adjust camber? :lol:

See, this is where things tend to get a little ridiculous. The intent of the current rule is clearly to allow camber adjustment devices as long as people don't go nuts and start changing pickup points.
You are absolutely right.
Nate has been doing a great job getting the rules in line, but there is always something that comes along that doesn't fit.
I'm a huge fan of having the intent of the rule written in with the rule.
As time goes on and technology changes, the intent is about all we have to make an informed and fair decision. :dontknow:
Les.

COM Instructor

NA Miata D-TYPE
#77

Drive it like you stole it!

User avatar
eclip5e
Speed Setter
Speed Setter
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Somerville, MA
Contact:

Post by eclip5e » Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:45 pm

So what is the proper way to get an ambiguity like this settled before the start of the first event? I think people building their cars for the upcoming season could benifit from this sort of clarification.
Ron. A
R̶A̶S̶p̶e̶c̶ ̶I̶m̶p̶r̶e̶z̶a̶ ̶W̶R̶X̶ ̶-̶ ̶#̶8̶6̶ 2004-2010
2017 Subaru BRZ Limited, 112T50

ryanthieme
Rookie Racer
Rookie Racer
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:51 pm
Location: Somewhere in MA

Post by ryanthieme » Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:45 pm

eclip5e wrote:So what is the proper way to get an ambiguity like this settled before the start of the first event? I think people building their cars for the upcoming season could benifit from this sort of clarification.
As I see it there are 3 options. 1) You just have to suck it up and run in the next group up where the modification is legal and request a rule modification next off-season; 2) Run the year without the mod and request a rule modification next off-season; 3) Run the year with the mod in the wrong class and risk being protested and request a rule modification next off-season.

A hard deadline has to be set at some point.
Last edited by ryanthieme on Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ryan Thieme
#334 ST3 Miata

cuda6666
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:54 am

Post by cuda6666 » Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:14 pm

As I see it there are 3 options. 1) You just have to suck it up and run in the next group up where the modification is legal and request a rule modification next off-season; 2) Run the year without the mod and request a rule modification next off-season; 3) Run the year with the mod in the wrong class and risk being protested and request a rule modification next off-season.
Option 4: Run the control arms, get protested, and then successfully argue the intent of the rule.

User avatar
rajito
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 595
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 11:33 pm

Post by rajito » Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:27 pm

Ron doesn't have to worry about getting protested, since only people who get beat protest.

Raj
#66 SuperSlowGT
Silver 2004 Nissan 350Z

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest