Questions, comments, and discussions concerning COMSCC rules.
	Moderators: Boondocker850, blindsidefive0
			
		
				
			- 
				
																			 kfoote
- Speed Setter
  
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 11:38 am
						
						
													
							
						
									
						Post
					
								by kfoote » Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:19 pm
			
			
			
			
			ctkag wrote:Well, I'd like to see another clarification too around the intercooler - allowing the intercooler hoses to be changed to the commonly used silicone hoses.  These are post turbo but pre throttle body.
-Keith-
This is legal in all classes as the rules are written now.  IX. Showroom Stock D. 4. states:
"4. Any make hoses, clamps, and belts are allowed."
ST rules reference this as being legal in ST as well.
Kevin Foote
#64 SB Nissan 350Z
1998-2003 Chief of Tech
1998-2002 BOD member
SSB Track Record Holder at LRP
						 
		 
				
		
		 
	 
	
				
		
				
			- 
				
																			 SillySpheres
						
						
													
							
						
									
						Post
					
								by SillySpheres » Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:12 pm
			
			
			
			
			therooster wrote:I thought that boost controllers were discussed at either the rules meeting last year or the year before. I quickly looked for my notes but I am a little disorganized at the moment and can not find them. Am I crazy or does any on else remember that meeting?
Chris A.
You are correct Chris.  I was the one who proposed this modification and it was voted down pretty handily.  However, a new group of people are bringing it up again this year.
 
		 
				
		
		 
	 
	
				
		
				
			- 
				
																			 JackFFR1846
- Speed Setter
  
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Hopkinton, MA
						
						
													
							
						
									
						Post
					
								by JackFFR1846 » Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:31 am
			
			
			
			
			I think a slight rewrite is needed to specifically prohibit routing the air inlet to make a ram-air intake where one did not exist before.  I know that my 2.5RS made noticibly more power down the straight when I sealed up the air system and took air from a duct in the airdam.  (I ran ST when it was like that).  
jack
			
									
									
						 
		 
				
		
		 
	 
	
				
		
				
			- 
				
								Mick							
- Administrator
  
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 2:55 pm
						
						
													
							
						
									
						Post
					
								by Mick » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:41 pm
			
			
			
			
			Air flow/mass metering and air temp sensing is often done before the throttle bodies. How will we deal with meters being relocated or replaced with higher flow rates? (something I would be in favor of 

) Are we in danger of this becoming a gray area? Should we clarify a bit more?
 
		 
				
		
		 
	 
	
				
		
				
			- 
				
																			 swinecanfly
- Fast Lapper
  
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:44 pm
						
						
													
							
						
									
						Post
					
								by swinecanfly » Mon Oct 24, 2005 10:54 pm
			
			
			
			
			Alex's proposal sounds like it allows replacement or relocation of meters and intake temperature sensors. If it doesn't allow it specifically I would support language that does.
Craig
			
									
									
						 
		 
				
		
		 
	 
	
	
	
	
		Who is online
		Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 1 guest