Latch vs camlock

General chat that fellow COM'ers may be interested in.
User avatar
breakaway500
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:47 am
Location: In my shop,usually.

Re: Latch vs camlock

Post by breakaway500 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:52 am

You can get pull up or pull down style harnesses in 2 or 5 yr. lifespans. It is odd how some companies rate the pull up models for two years vs. 5 years for pull downs.
It's not what you drive, it's how you drive. "Lap times matter"

Chrispy
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 11:46 am
Location: Chelmsford, MA

Re: Latch vs camlock

Post by Chrispy » Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:16 am

It is not weird at all, and it has nothing to do with the harness itself but rather the standard body spec to which it is certified.

SFI is rated for 2-years and FIA is rated for 5-years, but pull-up harnesses are "not allowed" under FIA rules therefor you can not get 5-year pull-up harnesses. I wanted pull-up but did not get them for this reason.
Chris Parsons
#22 - 95 Miata

User avatar
breakaway500
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:47 am
Location: In my shop,usually.

Re: Latch vs camlock

Post by breakaway500 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:23 am

Schroth makes pull up camlock harnesses that are rated for 5 years (FIA approved) ..http://www.hmsmotorsport.com/store/schr ... lubman-iii

Excerpt from the ad:

"Why would you want this belt?
There are a couple reasons you might want this belt. Mainly cost. Drag racers, circle track racers, and many other racing bodies must have SFI 16.1 approved harnesses. While our other restraints are SFI Approved, this ruleset requires that the restraints be replaced every two years.Replacing a ~$340 restraint every two years gets pricey.

To that end, we were determined to come up with a solution to the problem. Here is a belt that meets all the same stringent specifications that our other belts do (In addition to SFI 16.1, this belt also meets FIA approvals). Yet we cut costs to price it less than competitor's belts."
It's not what you drive, it's how you drive. "Lap times matter"

Chrispy
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 11:46 am
Location: Chelmsford, MA

Re: Latch vs camlock

Post by Chrispy » Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:53 am

That quote doesn't specify the configuration (available in multiple setups). You can call HMS to confirm since they punch the tags onsite, but I'm pretty sure that they would have to cut the FIA tag if you configure it as pull-up. It is also quite possible that the FIA changed the belt rules for this year, my information is from HMS as of last year. I'm beginning to see pull-up belts from other manufacturers as well so maybe this is the case, we can hope! My belts are configurable so I think I'll reconfigure it for pull-up.
Chris Parsons
#22 - 95 Miata

User avatar
breakaway500
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:47 am
Location: In my shop,usually.

Re: Latch vs camlock

Post by breakaway500 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:06 pm

"That quote doesn't specify the configuration (available in multiple setups)."

I bought one of these harnesses last year,in pull up style,for my Miata and it says FIA approved and has a 5 year expiration date on it. (4 years now)

I am sure you won't believe me without pictures or video,but I'm all done "helping" any more. WTF...
It's not what you drive, it's how you drive. "Lap times matter"

User avatar
cfossum
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 529
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:45 pm
Location: CT

Re: Latch vs camlock

Post by cfossum » Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:00 pm

To the OP, camlocks rule.
But I can't vouch for the up pull, I have personally found them more difficult to get sufficient tension. Then it occurred to me why. If you analyze it in a manner similar to any pulley system, there is a 2:1 mechanical advantage with the downpull setup that you do not get with the up pull variety.
-Carl

Chrispy
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 11:46 am
Location: Chelmsford, MA

Re: Latch vs camlock

Post by Chrispy » Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:08 pm

breakaway500 wrote:"That quote doesn't specify the configuration (available in multiple setups)."

I bought one of these harnesses last year,in pull up style,for my Miata and it says FIA approved and has a 5 year expiration date on it. (4 years now)

I am sure you won't believe me without pictures or video,but I'm all done "helping" any more. WTF...
Chill, not trying to argue I believe you, just going by what I was told and have read in a few places. I'm happy if things have changed or was given bad info. Plus if you buy a belt system that is reversible then it is a non-issue. The pull-down is a pain when you have tight spaces, i.e. door-panels and console still in the car.
Chris Parsons
#22 - 95 Miata

User avatar
naschmitz
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:33 pm

Re: Latch vs camlock

Post by naschmitz » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:15 pm

breakaway500 wrote:"That quote doesn't specify the configuration (available in multiple setups)."

I bought one of these harnesses last year,in pull up style,for my Miata and it says FIA approved and has a 5 year expiration date on it. (4 years now)

I am sure you won't believe me without pictures or video,but I'm all done "helping" any more. WTF...
I have two of these in my Vette -- pull-up style, FIA dated tags and SFI tags.
Bert Schmitz
#36 TT3 2006 Victory Red Corvette

User avatar
modifiede30
Rookie Racer
Rookie Racer
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Latch vs camlock

Post by modifiede30 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:29 pm

Sounds like the Schroth are the best deal given their dual certification and extended life - at $220/belt vs around $160 for a comparable belt that's going to last only 2 years, it seems pretty straight forward - over 5 years of use, that's almost half the cost on an annual basis.

Do any clubs/groups not accept the 5 year expiration and require you to replace them in 2 years?
1998 M Roadster - T70

jeffw
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 916
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:51 am
Location: Wilmington, MA

Re: Latch vs camlock

Post by jeffw » Sun Feb 10, 2013 8:05 pm

I've never seen an issue with anyone not honoring the 5 year dates on FIA belts.
Jeff Wasilko
On the Track: 1995 Miata #08
To the Track: 2007 Volvo 780
On the Street: 2017 Volvo V60 Polestar

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 1 guest