Roll Cage material clarification

[timmmy]

Hey Kevin,

Thanks - thought I was going mad not being able to find it.

Coming back to your earlier comment about 8 attachment points being a minimum, that certainly seems to hold fast as the other categories clearly state 8 points max, but production doesnt have that constraint.

I guess I need to get on teh SCCA forum and see if I cant get a formal from someone.....any Ideas who I should try to get in touch with?

As a side note one of the Motorgeek guys (fuel injection I am using) just posted some amazing home video from 1988 of the type 44 audis in teh rain.

This is the car I am building right now...man I cant wait until its done sometime in teh enxt year or three

http://www.trackfreak.com/marshall/88se ... A_0001.wmv [NOTE - the video is big, I recommend right clicking on the link and saving it to your hard drive rather than streaming it]


NJOY

[offcamber09]

Awesome video...thanks. It really makes me miss the Trans Am days when the cars had some character and weren't just nearly identical cars with different shells. Some of my favorite racing memories were watching Tommy Kendall and all go down no-name straight (LRP) in their Trans Am Mustangs. Don't think I didn't notice the video cameraman slip and grap a little of that blue Mustang

[therooster]

The no Superchargers/Turbo only applies to ITS/A/B/C not ITE.

And no LEGAL IT car should have its roll cage tied to the A or B Pillar. They may touch but cannot have any weld/bolts/or other forms of permanant attachment.

Here are the ITE rules for the Northeast Region SCCA:

http://www.scca-nnjr.org/NNJR_Race/NARRC.shtml#2

Chris A.

[offcamber09]

I don't know if the rules are more flexible in SPO, but Steve Savino for one runs a smoking fast 944T in that class.