Thoughts on power/weight classification

Questions, comments, and discussions concerning COMSCC rules.

Moderators: Boondocker850, blindsidefive0

4EyedFoxbody
Rookie Racer
Rookie Racer
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:51 am

Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by 4EyedFoxbody » Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:06 am

After running my first TT event where I was actually classed AND ran the TT on Sunday, I was pumped and completely deflated at the same time. You see guys and gals I am a tinkerer when it comes to my car. So much so that my 1978 Fairmont based Mustang ends up running with the awesome Z06 cars. Yeah I chuckle even typing that sentence! I was chatting with my suspension guys and he agreed that my Mustang will never be a Corvette. That being said, his racing club has a very simple rule format which I found interesting. Power to weight ratio. Period. This got me to thinking and I was wondering what peoples opinion on this concept (good or bad) would be?

John French
#175 Mustang GT T90
John French #175 1985 Mustang GT - SB

4EyedFoxbody
Rookie Racer
Rookie Racer
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:51 am

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by 4EyedFoxbody » Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:17 pm

Just did some catching up on the new super classes... better late than never I guess. I'm curious how many cars will filter into these new super classes?
John French #175 1985 Mustang GT - SB

User avatar
Stynger
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Medway, MA

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by Stynger » Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:51 pm

I suspect most of the current P and SP cars will stay, and a few Touring cars may move over.
Les.

COM Instructor

NA Miata D-TYPE
#77

Drive it like you stole it!

cuda6666
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:54 am

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by cuda6666 » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:11 pm

Les. Are you saying that the current SP and P classes will still exist in 2014?
Subaru Legacy GT #67

"Track time is my enemy"
- Frank Perron

"I remember when sex was safe and racing was dangerous."

eastcoastbumps
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:41 am
Location: Central MA

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by eastcoastbumps » Fri Nov 22, 2013 1:27 pm

I think he's saying most of the SP and P cars will be in Super next year, rather than moving to Touring. Only a few Touring competitors will be moving to Super.

I hope the new Super rules will make for some good competition next year.

John, did you have a scrutineer help you with classing or verify that it should be in T90? Were you aware that you could run your car in SP or P (with a roll cage and other proper safety gear) this year which allows nearly unlimited modifications?
Pete McParland #617
Honda S2000

cuda6666
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:54 am

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by cuda6666 » Fri Nov 22, 2013 5:51 pm

So, the answer to my question is "No". In the future, all COM classes will be based on power/weight and/or modification points. If you make your car faster, you get to run against faster cars.
Subaru Legacy GT #67

"Track time is my enemy"
- Frank Perron

"I remember when sex was safe and racing was dangerous."

User avatar
brucesallen
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 1468
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 9:56 am
Location: NH
Contact:

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by brucesallen » Sat Nov 23, 2013 12:14 pm

the base points for Touring classes consider all factors that affect the lap times of that car, not just Power to weight.
Bruce Allen
The Greased Shadow
"It's all about the fast lap"

cuda6666
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:54 am

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by cuda6666 » Sat Nov 23, 2013 1:35 pm

Like I said. If you come up with a way to make your car faster, you get to run against faster cars. I've got no problem with Communism as a social/political system - but on the race track, I think it's known as a spec series.
Subaru Legacy GT #67

"Track time is my enemy"
- Frank Perron

"I remember when sex was safe and racing was dangerous."

User avatar
brucesallen
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 1468
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 9:56 am
Location: NH
Contact:

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by brucesallen » Sun Nov 24, 2013 2:11 pm

cuda6666 wrote:Like I said. If you come up with a way to make your car faster, you get to run against faster cars. I've got no problem with Communism as a social/political system - but on the race track, I think it's known as a spec series.
more like a handicap series.
Bruce Allen
The Greased Shadow
"It's all about the fast lap"

cuda6666
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:54 am

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by cuda6666 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 5:25 pm

Yea OK, Bruce - handicapped. But I don't like being handicapped. I voted against extending the new rule paradigm to SP and P because I think we need to maintain a refuge for those of us who like to tinker with our cars. I don't mind that the showroom stock and ST classes have gone the way they have because those are the guys who like to keep things close to stock, anyway. I'd just like to see us keep some classes where in addition to being a good driver, you could gain an advantage by being a good mechanic. Otherwise, what do you do all winter if you're not plotting ways to make the car go faster? Going to an all handicap format kinda takes the fun out of it for me. Just sayin' :lol: :lol:
Subaru Legacy GT #67

"Track time is my enemy"
- Frank Perron

"I remember when sex was safe and racing was dangerous."

Souk
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 6:47 pm

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by Souk » Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:39 pm

Hello everyone, my name is Souk, and i am new, i spoke with Peter VIA phone for quite some time.
I love the idea of classes by power to weight ratio. its much more simplified. Then again , the rules themselves arent too complicated . This is just more straight forward which i have already mentioned. i like it. my question is although. What would qualify my car to be in the super class? T100+ Asessment points? now if my car isnt up to par, or lets say in T60 Class. would i still be in effect of the old rules of Street Prepared B?

User avatar
breakaway500
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:47 am
Location: In my shop,usually.

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by breakaway500 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:00 pm

"I'd just like to see us keep some classes where in addition to being a good driver, you could gain an advantage by being a good mechanic."

Ah,the days of innovation. I remember when Junior Johnson started to put camber on the rear end housings on Winston cup cars,and his team won more races.
Not illegal..it just had never been done before.
Pretty soon everyone did it,and all the cars handled better and were.. faster.
Nowadays,they would fine the entire team,banish the crew chief and dock the driver Championship points..for "cheating".
I liked Prepared classes because the rules allowed innovation within some moderate restraints,and were simple to enforce .. :sunny:
It's not what you drive, it's how you drive. "Lap times matter"

User avatar
blindsidefive0
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by blindsidefive0 » Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:07 am

Souk - you can run in Super if you have the right safety equipment. Touring classes, depending on your modifications, MAY require the same safety equipment. I sent you a PM with the new rules and my email address if you need more information.
- Nick
nicholas.fontana@gmail.com

1999 Mazda Miata - T50
FS: 1997 Green BMW M3 - T80/SC
RIP: 1994 White BMW 325i - SSB

User avatar
brucesallen
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 1468
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 9:56 am
Location: NH
Contact:

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by brucesallen » Mon Nov 25, 2013 12:08 pm

the problem with Prepared classes in the past is there are so few cars registered that the classes often had no competition and in one class there may be wide disparity of car performance that cannot be overcome with a good mechanic.
And, of course, SP was so simple it made no sense at all.
Bruce Allen
The Greased Shadow
"It's all about the fast lap"

cuda6666
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:54 am

Re: Thoughts on power/weight classification

Post by cuda6666 » Mon Nov 25, 2013 12:23 pm

brucesallen wrote:And, of course, SP was so simple it made no sense at all.
Hey. I resemble that remark. What do you mean, exactly?
Subaru Legacy GT #67

"Track time is my enemy"
- Frank Perron

"I remember when sex was safe and racing was dangerous."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest