Am I interpreting the "stock part" rule correctly?

Questions, comments, and discussions concerning COMSCC rules.

Moderators: Boondocker850, blindsidefive0

Post Reply
User avatar
Dave_G
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:05 pm
Location: Vermont

Am I interpreting the "stock part" rule correctly?

Post by Dave_G » Fri May 09, 2008 2:25 pm

I've been wanting to remove the power steering from my 1990 Miata, but have refrained from doing so for fear of running afoul of the "stock component" portion of the SS/ST rules, the one that says all components must be of "stock configuration," and that
[quote]A “stock componentâ€
Dave
ST4 Miata #62

Grippy
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 376
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:59 pm
Location: Northbridge, MA

Post by Grippy » Fri May 09, 2008 3:07 pm

I think you have it right.

Drop in a manual rack and forget about it.
Gordon Andrade
#10 Super C MX-5

nhsilversti
Speed Setter
Speed Setter
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: southern NH

Post by nhsilversti » Fri May 09, 2008 10:34 pm

didnt your PS belt break and you cant seem to locate a new one due to a worldwide backorder :wink:
need parts for your trailer, welding repairs/fabrication (sorry cant do aluminum), tires mounted and balanced, feel free to email/pm me. i am located a little west of nashua. ted

User avatar
brucesallen
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 1468
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 9:56 am
Location: NH
Contact:

Re: Am I interpreting the "stock part" rule correc

Post by brucesallen » Sat May 10, 2008 12:01 pm

Dave_G wrote:
In other words, I'm thinking:
- Remove the PS pump and install a manual rack - (legal)
- Remove the PS pump and keep the PS rack (illegal)

Is this correct?
You are correct.
Bruce Allen
The Greased Shadow
"It's all about the fast lap"

offcamber09
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 1014
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: East Kingston, NH
Contact:

Post by offcamber09 » Sat May 10, 2008 3:36 pm

Does the part have to be "stock" or "in stock" :lol:
Scott Rosnick
#09 BMW 318ti-6

User avatar
ctkag
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:29 am

Post by ctkag » Sat May 10, 2008 7:36 pm

Ted's comment has merit if you can bypass the ps pump with whatever belt configuration you have. That would effectively disable the ps and keep the pump in the car.
-Keith-

SPB116

User avatar
chaos4NH
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1894
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:58 pm
Location: NH

Post by chaos4NH » Sat May 10, 2008 8:08 pm

Damn! Jr Johnson doesn't have anything on the way these guys stretch the belts.....I mean the rules!! :lol:
Sam
Chief of Operations

#41 Nissan 200SX SER T40

User avatar
Dave_G
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:05 pm
Location: Vermont

Post by Dave_G » Sat May 10, 2008 8:29 pm

Thanks for the clarification, guys. I'm glad I checked before I did anything irreversible. ;)
Grippy wrote:Drop in a manual rack and forget about it.
Yeah, except the manual rack has a slower steering ratio than the PS rack. I'd rather keep my current steering ratio. Given that keeping the PS entails both zero cost and zero labor, my decision is easy. :)
if you can bypass the ps pump with whatever belt configuration you have. That would effectively disable the ps and keep the pump in the car.
Even if I wasn't afraid that that was somehow cheating, that's not an option anyway. If you just disable the pump you end up with impossibly hard steering (yes, even in a Miata!). You've got to give the fluid in the rack someplace to go, which is why people who do this loop the lines from one side of the rack to the other. Then the PS fluid can slosh around inside the rack when you turn the wheel.

But if I did that, it would put me in SPC, and that's where all the scary Miatas play. :P I like ST4 just fine.
Dave
ST4 Miata #62

Grippy
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 376
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:59 pm
Location: Northbridge, MA

Post by Grippy » Sun May 11, 2008 9:52 am

I switched to a manual rack and didn't even notice the difference in ratio on the track, I think it is more obvious on the street and auto-X. It is only a slight difference anyway.

The best way to de-power a rack is to take it apart and cut off the piston and seal on the rack. No more moving any fluid. You can also adjust the preload on the bearings which can reduce the turning effort. Someone sells a set of plugs to remove the hoses completely which is much cleaner looking than looping the hoses (and lighter). Keith Tanner has a nice how to writeup on his site.

Just keep your eyes open for a used manual rack for $50, they are out there.
Gordon Andrade
#10 Super C MX-5

skivittlerjimb
Rookie Driver
Rookie Driver
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:59 am
Location: Williston, VT

Post by skivittlerjimb » Sun May 11, 2008 9:47 pm

The slower ratio might be fine on the track, but Dave's Miata is a pretty competent CSP autox ride, too. I say stick to ST4, Dave, and leave the rack as is.

SPB is pretty much a lost cause for an old ride like mine, as is SM in autox, but I like my car and don't really care too much about class results. Raw time comparisons are fun, and useful for either ego-stoking or improvement self-motivation as needed.

I've thought about manual rack conversion on my GVR4 for weight savings and simplicity under hood, but that'd mean going from a little less than 3 turns lock-to-lock to 4.1 turns lock-to-lock with a 1.8L DSM rack. Talk about sawing at the wheel. :roll: Are steering quickeners legal in SP, or does that make you Prepared? Just kidding...
-Jim B.
GVR4 280/1000

offcamber09
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 1014
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: East Kingston, NH
Contact:

Post by offcamber09 » Wed May 14, 2008 9:53 pm

We've got a manual rack out of a 1992-as of yesterday- $100 b.o.

Fastrack- 978-977-0707
Scott Rosnick
#09 BMW 318ti-6

User avatar
Dave_G
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:05 pm
Location: Vermont

Post by Dave_G » Wed May 14, 2008 11:04 pm

offcamber09 wrote:We've got a manual rack out of a 1992
Scott, thanks for the heads-up. But like Jim says, my car does double-duty as an auto-x car too, (actually triple-duty since I also drive it on the street), and I know enough people who hate their slow-ratio manual rack in that environment that I've decided to stick with PS for now.

It served me pretty well in ST4 last year -- if only I can keep it up this year!
Dave
ST4 Miata #62

User avatar
breakaway500
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:47 am
Location: In my shop,usually.

Post by breakaway500 » Thu May 15, 2008 6:38 am

Why do you want to remove the power steering?Is is a weight issue or possibly that you do not care for the pump and hose clutter? Just wondering.
My Atom does not have power steering and after a day of A/X I feel like I just climbed off a motocross bike. Tough to get old :wink:
It's not what you drive, it's how you drive. "Lap times matter"

JackFFR1846
Speed Setter
Speed Setter
Posts: 187
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Hopkinton, MA

Post by JackFFR1846 » Wed May 21, 2008 2:20 pm

If you were to "lose a belt" and one of the steering rack hoses were to fall off and drain all the fluid, I suppose you'd still be inside the letter of the law. It's essentially how Factory Five Cobras were done initially.

I suppose that if someone really, really wanted to protest you, there might be some 'splaining to do, but.......

jack

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest