BIG CHANGE! SP safety rules now same as SS/ST

Questions, comments, and discussions concerning COMSCC rules.

Moderators: Boondocker850, blindsidefive0

Grippy
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 376
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:59 pm
Location: Northbridge, MA

Post by Grippy » Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:59 am

our hope is to draw more new people in, and that once the hook is set they will see the light and WANT more safety equipment.
Gordon Andrade
#10 Super C MX-5

User avatar
brucesallen
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 1468
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 9:56 am
Location: NH
Contact:

Post by brucesallen » Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:32 am

ctkag wrote:
What I would have preferred to see was a modification to the ST rules that permitted more modifications as typically seen on street-driven cars and left SP as the place for more highly prepared yet still street legal cars. Allow in ST such things as injector/carburetor/manifold upgrades, maybe even - brace yourselves - boost upgrades via boost controllers/ECU tuning. I'm thinking of trying to encompass what the typical 'tuner' car on the street might have done.
The rules are that car classifications cannot be changed during the season. Make proposed changes next October/November or earlier if the changes are sweeping.
Bruce Allen
The Greased Shadow
"It's all about the fast lap"

User avatar
tju-vette
Speed Setter
Speed Setter
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:21 am
Location: Manchester NH
Contact:

Post by tju-vette » Sun Apr 20, 2008 7:18 pm

I applaud the BOD for making this change. I certainly respect the opinions of those who think this may not be a good thing but I am happy to see it.

I too believe in safety and run a SA full face helmet, neck restraint and a world class harness bar and harness setup. However, as I am tall (6'4") I had no hope of going up to an SP class and passing the 2" rule for rollbars.

Now I can safely go to SP with my new hiem joint IRS suspension and even consider coilovers for my car! WOOHOO.

Thank you BOD!
Tom, 93 Corvette Coupe, 166 STGT
Owner, Banski MotorSports LLC

check us out online at http://www.banskimotorsports.com
email me at tom@banskimotorsports.com

User avatar
chaos4NH
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1894
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:58 pm
Location: NH

Post by chaos4NH » Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:01 pm

tju-vette wrote:I applaud the BOD for making this change. I certainly respect the opinions of those who think this may not be a good thing but I am happy to see it.

I too believe in safety and run a SA full face helmet, neck restraint and a world class harness bar and harness setup. However, as I am tall (6'4") I had no hope of going up to an SP class and passing the 2" rule for rollbars.

Now I can safely go to SP with my new hiem joint IRS suspension and even consider coilovers for my car! WOOHOO.

Thank you BOD!
You are welcome Tom! Your input in the rules meeting last year and some conversations with guys who run with SCDA, and other clubs, were key in our decision.

As for the changes ctkrag favors, I hope that does not come to pass. ST has been thought of as the suspension, intake and exhaust mod class, with SP being more motor oriented, i.e. boost controllers, cams, aftermarket turbos, etc. ST cars have a legimate place in the rules. We have opened up the SP rules, so mod away for SP.
Sam
Chief of Operations

#41 Nissan 200SX SER T40

cuda6666
Speed Racer
Speed Racer
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:54 am

Post by cuda6666 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:52 pm

Just noticed that there are a couple of misprints in the rules blurb on the Home page. Says "ST" in a couple of places where it should say "SP."
Subaru Legacy GT #67

"Track time is my enemy"
- Frank Perron

"I remember when sex was safe and racing was dangerous."

User avatar
Mick
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 1088
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 2:55 pm

Post by Mick » Tue Jun 10, 2008 3:41 pm

Thanks, fixed.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests